Mithilesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79414 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2025 Thana- Sinha District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Mithilesh Kumar Singh S/o- Late Kamal Dev Singh R/O Village- Chaumukha P.S. - Ara Muffasil, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Meena Singh, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the defects as pointed out by the office have been removed except one defect which requires filing of a typed copy but then the typed copy is a readable.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the said defect is ignored.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 33 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79414 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026 2/3
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that petitioner is not the owner of the seized vehicle and came to be implicated based on the confessional statement of Vikash Kumar in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value in the eye of law.
7. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
8. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sinha P.S. Case No. 62 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the BNSS.
9. It is made clear that thereafter the learned trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, it
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79414 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026 3/3 would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T