Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84372/2024dismissed

Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Yadav @ Dipak v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-17Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84372 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2022 Thana- SIWAN CITY District- Siwan ====================================================== Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Yadav @ Dipak Son of Srikant Prasad Yadav @ Lalbabu Yadav R/O-Village- Madhopur Hazari, Ps- Sajebanj, District- East Chamaparan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-01-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The following order was passed on 17.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5737 of 2024"- "Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, in broad daylight Rs. 22 Lakhs were looted from the bank.

4. Materials have come during investigation to connect the petitioner with the loot. The petitioner is accused in serious case under Section 396, 302 of the I.P.C. The petitioner is in jail since 17.09.2023.

5. Considering the fact that petitioner is a hardened criminal involved in murder with dacoity, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. This application for regular bail is dismissed.

7. The trial of the present case as well as Baikunthpur P.S. Case No. 45 of 2022 is directed to be expedited.

8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the District Judge, Siwan and Superintendent of Police, Siwan through FAX who will take all steps for early

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84372 of 2024(3) dt.17-01-2025 2/2 conclusion of the trial of the petitioner in both the aforesaid cases."

3. No ground for review is made out. This application is dismissed.

4. The trial is directed to be expedited.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T