Sahid Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73909 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2025 Thana- Jagdishpur District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Sahid Hussain Son of Shamshul Hoda Resident of village- Banhaura Sota Ps -Jagdishpur District -West Champaran 2.

Imteyaj Alam son of Mahmood Mian Resident of village- Banhaura Bazar, Ps -Jagdishpur District -West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sujeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-11-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 121(1), 132, 263, 352 of the BNS and Section 45 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that Sahil along with Riyaz in an intoxicated condition were apprehended along with a motorcycle when 8-10 unknown accused came and assaulted the police force and apprehended accused fled.

4. Learned counsel submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73909 of 2025(2) dt.04-11-2025 2/2 it would manifest that the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. It is also submitted that petitioners are resident of a nearby place where the occurrence took place as such when they heard ruckus they out of inquisitiveness came out of the house to witness the occurrence when they came to be implicated. It is reiterated and submitted that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No.80/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T