Madhusudan Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5104 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2020 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.
MADHUSUDAN SAH SON OF LATE RAJENDRA SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SADPUR, P.S. - SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTRICT - BEGUSARAI 2.
SATTO @ SANTOSH SAH SON OF LATE RAJENDRA SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SADPUR, P.S. - SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTRICT - BEGUSARAI 3.
KAUSHAL SAH SON OF LATE RAJENDRA SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SADPUR, P.S. - SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTRICT - BEGUSARAI 4.
BHARGAV SAH @ KUMAR BHARGAV SON OF LATE RAJENDRA SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SADPUR, P.S. - SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTRICT - BEGUSARAI 5.
NIL KAMAL @ NIL KAMAL KUMAR SON OF MADHUSUDAN SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SADPUR, P.S. - SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTRICT - BEGUSARAI 6.
SWET KAMAL @ RAJ KAMAL RAJ @ SWET KAMAL SAH SON OF MADHUSUDAN SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SADPUR, P.S. - SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTRICT - BEGUSARAI ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
ABHILASHA KUMARI WIFE OF SAROJ KUMAR DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SADPUR, P.S. - SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTRICT - BEGUSARAI ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellants :
Mr. Anshu Dhar Sharma, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Binay Krishna, APP For Respondent No.2 :
Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-07-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant/Respondent No. 2 that
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5104 of 2023(4) dt.10-07-2024 2/2 the prayer for pre-arrest bail of these appellants is not maintainable as cognizance has already been taken by the learned court below also for the offences punishable under the SC/ST Act. In this regard, reliance is placed in the case of Bachu Das Vs. State of Bihar and others, reported in (2014) 3 Supreme Court Cases 471.
3. In view of the aforesaid pronouncement of law rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court, appellants' prayer of pre-arrest is dismissed.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T