← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76544/2023allowed

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-30Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76544 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-507 Year-2023 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar Sahni S/O Sikandar Sahni @ Wakil Sahni R/O Village- Sakara Basa, P.S- Cheriya Bariyarpur, Distt.- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 30-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is of committing rape upon the informant on the false pretext of marriage.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. He submitted that victim is a major lady, who is aged about 20 years. There is a consensual relationship between the petitioner and the victim. There is a major contradiction between the prosecution case and the statement of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76544 of 2023(3) dt.30-01-2024 2/2 the victim recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C. He further submitted that Medical report has not supported the prosecution case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 14.09.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge, if not framed. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 507 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T