Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6789 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2017 Thana -JANKINAGAR District- PURNIA ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Yadav, son of Bhupendra Yadav, resident of Village- Rahil Tola Naulakhi, P.S. Janki Nagar, District- Purnea. ... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner has been in custody since 11.10.2017 in connection with Janki Nagar P.S. Case No. 55 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341/323/379/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only because of the dispute with regard to the election of Mukhiya, the preset case has been instituted against him. It has been submitted that the motorcycle was recovered from an abandoned place at National Highway-107 and there is no recovery from the present petitioner.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6789 of 2018 (3) dt.20-02-2018 2/2 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Purnea, in connection with Janki Nagar P.S. Case No. 55 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U