Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7500/2018rejected

Barun Roy v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-07Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7500 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2017 Thana- MAUZAHIDPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Barun Roy Son of Musso @ Ganesh Roy, Resident of Village-Kalabganj Mirjanhat, P.S.-Mojahidpur, District-Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SRI ARUN KUMAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

Petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Mojahidpur P.S. Case No.82 of 2017, giving rise to Sessions Trial No.756 of 2017, registered under Sections 302/120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation in brief is that the petitioner killed the informant's brother by stabbing him, when the informant and others reached there they saw the petitioner running away with blood stained knife.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no eye witness and the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case, moreover petitioner has no antecedent except one case under Sections 420, 467 and other Section of IPC and police has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7500 of 2018(2) dt.07-02-2018 2/2 submitted charge-sheet and in custody since 04.08.2017. Having considered the said facts and circumstances and specific allegation against the petitioner, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected for the present in connection with Mojahidpur P.S. Case No.82 of 2017, giving rise to Sessions Trial No.756 of 2017, pending in the court of learned 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Bhagalpur.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and preferably conclude the same within a year.

(Arun Kumar, J) S.KUMAR/- U T