← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74111/2019bail granted

Sundar Murmu @ Sundar Lal Murmu v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-11Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74111 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2006 Thana- BANKA District- Banka ====================================================== Sundar Murmu @ Sundar Lal Murmu Son of Babulal Murmu Residence of Village-Dudhiyapur, P.S-Banka, District-Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vibhakar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 339 of 2006 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 307 and 302 of I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per F.I.R., the petitioner and twenty five other accused persons were assaulted the informant by various arms. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the dispute with respect to harvesting of the paddy crop. There is a case and counter case between the parties. No specific injury has been attributed any of the accused persons including the petitioner. He is in custody since 18.07.2019. Charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tempering with the evidence.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74111 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge-I, Banka, in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 339 of 2006, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Rahul Mishra/- U T