Raju Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83066 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-421 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Raju Paswan S/O Bashant Paswan R/O Village- Bhadeja, P.S- Muffasil, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 421 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 341,323,386, 504,506,34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other 12 person arrived at the shop of the informant and demanded Rangdari. When the informant objected they started assaulted him. They also pointed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83066 of 2024(2) dt.11-12-2024 2/3 country-made pistol on him and made firing in air. One Ranjan Paswan took Rs. 67,800/- from the cash box.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that before the parting, the accused persons threatened the informant of dire consequence if Rs. One lakh per month was not given to him as Rangdari. From the perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus and specific allegation is against one Ranjan Paswan. Petitioner is having antecedent of one case.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 421 of 2024, he will be enlarged on bail on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83066 of 2024(2) dt.11-12-2024 3/3 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) krishnakant/- U T