Satyanarayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75014 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2019 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== SATYANARAYAN YADAV Son of Kashi Yadav Resident of Village - Dahiyari, P.S.- Sono, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Niranjan Parihar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Sono PS case no. 185 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other sections of IPC.

The case of the prosecution is that while all the five accused persons were ploughing the field of the informant, the informant had objected to the same, whereupon the petitioner herein had given an axe blow over the head of the informant resulting in the informant having fallen down on the ground, whereupon all the other accused persons are said to have assaulted by lathi and danda. It is the further allegation of the informant that when his wife, son and aunt had come to save

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75014 of 2019(2) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 him, they were all abused and assaulted by the accused persons. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, he is having a clean antecedent and he has no complicity in the matter and only on account of previous enmity, his name has been falsely roped in the present case.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials on record as also gone through the F.I.R. in question and I find that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of having given axe blow on the head of the informant and the impugned order dated 27.09.2019, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jamui, also corroborates the same, hence this Court finds that the petitioner is not entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail, especially on account of grave and serious allegation against the petitioner herein of having given an axe blow on the head of the informant resulting in infliction of serious injuries on the head of the informant, which is a heinous offence, thus the present bail petition stands dismissed, being devoid of any merit.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U T