Gurpreet Singh @ Gopi Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79110 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-279 Year-2023 Thana- ITARHI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.
Gurpreet Singh @ Gopi Singh S/O Avatar Singh Resident of village V Gharka, P.S -Chohla Sahib, District -Taran Tran ,State - Punjab. 2.
Jobanpreet Singh S/O Lakha Singh Resident of village V Gharka, P.S -Chohla Sahib, District -Taran Tran ,State - Punjab. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 379, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The case of the prosecution is that Gurpreet Singh and Jobanpreet Singh assaulted the son of the informant with an iron rod. It is further alleged that Rs. 79,000/- and a mobile was also taken away by the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. They have got no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that the petitioners are laborers. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 14.05.2024.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79110 of 2024(4) dt.24-02-2025 2/2
5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail and submits that from perusal of the injury report, it transpires that the victim has received four injuries, out of which, injury Nos. 1 and 4 are simple in nature, whereas injury No. 2 is simple in nature but caused by sharp edge object, injury No. 3 is multiple broken teeth, which is grievous in nature. Injury No. 3 shows that sharp edge object has been used but from perusal of the FIR, it transpires that the petitioners have assaulted with an iron rod, which is hard and blunt object.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 206 of 2024 arising out of Itarshi P.S. Case No. 279 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge-Xth, Buxar. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T