Sanoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69964 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-432 Year-2015 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Sanoj Yadav Son of Surendra Yadav Resident of Village- Kabiyahi, Police Station- Shankarpur, District- Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 16.08.2018 in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi) P.S. Case No. 432 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR, but subsequently, in the confessional made before the police by one Tufani Yadav, the petitioner has been taken into custody. It is further submitted that no recovery has been made from his conscious possession nor has he been placed on T.I. Parade.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69964 of 2019(2) dt.18-11-2019 2/2 bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepua, in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi) P.S. Case No. 432 of 2015, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T