Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/1607/2018allowed

Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-11Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1607 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -444 Year- 2017 Thana -KRITYANAND NAGAR District- PURNIA ===========================================================

1. Sunil Yadav S/o Late Jay Narayan Yadav, R/o Vill.- Dumariya Satkodariya, P.S.- K. Nagar (Maranga), District- Purnea.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, SPP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Purnea, in connection with K.Nagar (Maranga) Police Station Case No.444 of 2017 arising out of SC/ST Special Case No.174 of 2017 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 386, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Allegation against the appellant is of demand of ransom at the brick-kiln of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1607 of 2018 dt.11-05-2018 Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has got no criminal antecedent and for the same occurrence, two FIRs have been lodged, one by the Manager of the brick-kiln and another by the owner of the brick-kiln. Appellant is in custody since 25.01.2018. No ransom was paid to anyone.

Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date15.05.2018 Transmission Date 15.05.2018