Raghav Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28547 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -163 Year- 2017 Thana -NAUGACHIA District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================
1. Raghav Pandey S/o Sri Prabhakar Pandey Resident of Mohalla- Chaiti Durga Asthan Shahid Tola Makhatakiya, P.S. Nuagachia, DistrictBhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 11.01.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 61842 of 2017 with direction to the court below to expedite the trial.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that there was only recovery of a country made pistol from the possession of the petitioner, for which he has sufficiently been punished as he has been in judicial custody since 28.07.2017 and other co-accused of this case has already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.03.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3271 of 2018.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody and also that other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail, as such, let the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28547 of 2018 (2) dt.09-05-2018 2/2 petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -II. Naugachia, Bhagalpur, in connection with Naugachia P.S. Case No. 163 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T