Arun Sahani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74578 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-755 Year-2019 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Arun Sahani S/o Late Mohan Sahani R/o Village - Vishunpur Basant @ Bishunpur Basant, P. S. - Saraiya, Dist. - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard Mr. Virendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, learned APP representing the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 755 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, lodged on 11.11.2019 by the informant Shailesh Kumar Prasad.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant an employee of L&T Finance alleged that after collecting monthly installment, as he was coming to the Branch, unknown criminals riding on Hero-Honda motorcycles intercepted and on the point of pistol took away the motorcycle and the amount of Rs.1,01,650/-. They also opened fire causing injury in the left
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74578 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 hand. This led to the F.I.R.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only on the basis of criminal antecedent, he has been implicated, the witnesses have named them, the person arrested has not named him.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that a perusal of the paragraph no.3 of the petition would show that the the petitioner has criminal antecedent of the same nature, during investigation his name has come and the person arrested Mithilesh Kumar, his bail application was earlier rejected.
6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the criminal antecedent that the petitioner has, no case of anticipatory bail is made out. It is accordingly rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T