Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76319/2025bail rejected

Hare Ram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76319 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2025 Thana- Sinha District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Hare Ram Yadav S/O Late Suresh Yadav R/O Village- Mani rai KeTolla Salempur, P.S- Ara Muffasil, Distt.- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Swetha Devi W/O Sanjay Singh R/O Village- Kudariyan, P.S- Sinha, Dist.tBhojpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamlesh Prasad Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sinha P.S. Case no.77 of 2025 registered under sections 75 and 79 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and sections 8, 10 and 12 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that her 9 year old daughter, while on way to her school in the school bus, was physically abused by the driver ie the petitioner herein as also the Khalasi.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He happens to be the driver of the vehicle in question. The victim has not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76319 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 supported the allegations so far as the petitioner is concerned in course of investigation in her statement under section 183 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 10.9.2025. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case.

5. The application is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the informant submits that there is direct allegation against the petitioner in the FIR that he was the driver of the vehicle when the occurrence took place besides the petitioner himself having abused the nine year old daughter of the informant.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner and one another in the FIR of having physically abused the 9 year old daughter of the informant on way to her school, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U T