← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75600/2025bail granted

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-11Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75600 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-536 Year-2025 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Rahul Kumar S/O Rajesh Paswan R/O Vill.- Chakgaji @ Chakghazi, P.S.- Ahiyapur, Dist.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 536 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 8(c), 21(b), 8, 20(B)IIA of the NDPS Act.

3. Prosecution allegation, in short, is that there is recovery of total 29.83 gram smack and 661.13 gram ganja in this case and the petitioner was apprehended on spot along with other co-accused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75600 of 2025(2) dt.11-11-2025 2/2 the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of the contraband. The recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 17.04.2025 and has got two criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the recovered contraband being below the commercial quantity and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 536 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T