Kanhaiya Kahar @ Kanhaiya Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75660 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Kanhaiya Kahar @ Kanhaiya Prasad S/o Late Vishwanath Kahar R/o Village- Medanipur, PS- Dinara, District- Rohtas 2.

Amit Kahar @ Amit Kumar Chandravanshi S/o Kanhaiya Kahar @ Kanhaiya Prasad R/o Village- Medanipur, PS- Dinara, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nagendra Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 191(2), 190, 352, 351(2), 117(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 has antecedent of one case and petitioner no. 2 is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he along with his sons were returning home after getting the land measured, when the accused persons intercepted them and women accused started pelting stones causing injury to him and his sons on head. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75660 of 2025(2) dt.17-12-2025 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is also submitted that though allegation is of pelting stones causing injury on head, but then the allegation of assault is not specific. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 293 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T