← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75370/2022allowed

Vinay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-25Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75370 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-323 Year-2022 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vinay Kumar Son Of Birchandra Prasad Singh R/O Village- Chhitrauli, P.S.- Goraul, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rina Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 25-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The prosecution case as per F.I.R is that while the daughter of the informant was coming home after attending coaching classes, co-accused Rahul Kumar and one other person surrounded her and Rahul Kumar shot fire at her, as a result of which, she received gunshot injuries and died at the spot.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75370 of 2022(6) dt.25-07-2023 2/3 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and his name subsequently sprang up on the confessional statement of co-accused Rahul Kumar. There is no eye witness to the occurrence. It is the specific case of the prosecution that co-accused Rahul Kumar shot at the deceased, as a result of which, she died. He has also confessed his guilt and on his confession and identification, the weapon used in the crime was recovered. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 17.05.2022. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts aforesaid and the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75370 of 2022(6) dt.25-07-2023 3/3 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 323 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T