Kishan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75608 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2025 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Kishan Kumar Son of Late Tapeshwar Ram Resident of Village - Dihthi, P.S.- Sahiyara, District - Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case no.271 of 2025 registered under sections 309(4), 309(6) and 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that three accused persons came. Out of the three accused, one of them fired with a pistol causing injury in his leg. The informant was looted of his mobile phone and his motorcycle. The informant states that he could not identify the accused.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated in the case. Though the petitioner was identified in the T.I. parade by the informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75608 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 neither he was identified as a person who fired upon him and there is delay of two months since the arrest of the petitioner and conduct of the T.I. parade. The petitioner is in custody since 21.6.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation in the FIR, recovery of the number plate of the stolen vehicle of the informant on the basis of the confession of the petitioner together with the informant having identified the petitioner in the T.I. parade conducted, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.
7. Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T