Jakir Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79988 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Jakir Ray, S/O Gautam Ray, R/o Village- Dewapur, Akhil Tola, P.S.- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sarvesh Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-02-2025 Heard Mr. Sarvesh Kashyap, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.37 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the I.T. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that a fraud was committed with the informant of Rs.22,632 /- by making a call from mobile no.9135246766. The F.I.R. was registered against unknown miscreants.The holder of the mobile was apprehended. He has named Hussain. Hussain has given his confessional statement and in his confessional statement, he has named one Jamaluddin. Jamaluddin has given his confessional and he has named this petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79988 of 2024(3) dt.25-02-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. According to the confessional statement of Jamaluddin, this petitioner has also opened an account on his allurement in Fino Bank. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no amount has been received in the above account of the petitioner. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is languishing in judicial custody since 29.06.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 37 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T