Ranvir Bhagat @ Ranvir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1050 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2011 Thana- KANTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RANVIR BHAGAT @ RANVIR KUMAR Son of Mohan Bhagat Resident of village - Bakatpur, P.S.- Kanti, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar @ S.K.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 25-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, several accused persons including the petitioner entered into the house of informant and assaulted to her husband in her absence as a result of which blood was oozing from his chest and he died. It is further alleged that informant has seen the petitioner armed with gun and several accused persons were fleeing from the back side of her house. The alleged occurrence took place because informant's husband had not cast vote to the Mukhiya candidate. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1050 of 2023(2) dt.25-02-2023 2/2 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Informant has not seen the actual occurrence rather she has only seen the persons fleeing from the back side of her house. Both parties are co-villages. In fact, deceased died by misfiring done by the relative of the deceased. Except last seen evidence, nothing is brought on record to implicate the petitioner in the present case. Petitioner is languishing in custody since 19.10.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 206 of 2011.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U