Mahendra Das @ Mahendra Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76047 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2011 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Mahendra Das @ Mahendra Ravidas, Son of Nathu Ravidas, Resident of Village-Kudwa, P.S-Goh, District-Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dipak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-11-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Goh P. S Case No. 86 of 2011, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 341, 379, 384, 435 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per F.I.R. there is allegation that some miscreants had come and set the JCB Machine on fire and also damaged the other articles.

Submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is not named in the F.I.R. later on, his name transpires on the confessional statement of co-accused Mritunjay Mishra, who has already been granted regular bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 29.03.2017 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 8606 of 2017 and one more accused Rajendra Bhuiyan has been granted regular bail by this Court, vide order dated 01.03.2017 passed in Criminal Misc.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76047 of 2019(2) dt.25-11-2019 2/2 No. 9047 of 2017. Further submission is that petitioner is in custody for about three and half months and the charge sheet has already been submitted. He is ready to abide by any condition imposed upon him.

Heard learned APP for the State also, who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that he is accused in two other serious offences.

Having heard both sides, considering the submissions, made above, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Aurangabad, in connection with Goh P. S. Case No. 86 of 2011, with condition that one of the bailors should be the close relative having property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. Further condition that he has to co-operate in disposal of the trial and appear as and when required, otherwise, his bail bonds shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T