Viman Kumar @ Rahul Kumar @ Bhimant Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78686 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2024 Thana- INDRAPURI District- Rohtas ====================================================== Viman Kumar @ Rahul Kumar @ Bhimant Kushwaha Son of Kanhai Mahto Resident of Village - Semari, P.S.- Mali, District - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 87 of B.N.S., 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his daughter, aged about 18 years, on 11.12.2024 at 11:00 a.m. went to the college but did not return, accordingly, a search was made, when informant came to know that his daughter used to talk to a person having mobile number 9955872951, thus alleges that bearer of the aforesaid mobile number fled with his daughter.
4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has not been implicated in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78686 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/3 case by name but then informant very wisely implicated him by his mobile number. It is next submitted that informant was aware that his daughter was in a relationship with the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner and the victim were in love and they had eloped but when the instant false case came to be instituted, the victim came back. It is submitted that from perusal of Annexure-2, it would manifest that victim in writing had given to the police that she does not intend to go for any medical or pathological check up. It is further submitted that the statement of the victim was recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S. wherein she has not supported the allegation of kidnapping. It is next submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will co-operate in the investigation to prove his innocence.
5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78686 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 3/3 satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Indrapuri P.S. Case No.79 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T