Dinesh Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42106 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Dinesh Pandey S/o Late Kedar Pandey resident of Village - Sangrampur, P.S. Sangrampur, District - Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 51 of 2018, Trial No. 1639 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 448, 341, 323, 307, 379, 506 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with other accused persons entered into the house of the informant and assaulted Dinesh Pandey with a sword blow on his head, causing head injury.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no specific allegation of assault by sword to the informant and there is only one injury found on the person of the informant and moreover the petitioners' side lodged murder case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42106 of 2018 (2) dt.19-07-2018 2/2 against the informant.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, surrenders before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, he will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Munger in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 51 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 ( 2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T