Ravi Rauniyar @ Ravi Kumar @ Amrendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.788 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2021 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== RAVI RAUNIYAR @ RAVI KUMAR @ AMRENDRA KUMAR Son of Sitaram Kumar @ Sitaram Sah R/V- Bhavdepur, P.s- Riga. Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 10.08.2021 and has antecedent of ten cases.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation is of committing robbery of cash and mobile phones by unknown miscreants. The learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot and his name transpired in the confessional statement of Gulzar

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.788 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 2/2 Ansari, it is next submitted that Gulzar Ansari has been granted regular bail by order dated 09.05.2022 in Cr. Misc No. 57535 of 2021, it is next submitted that Pankaj Kumar, Prince Kumar whose names also transpired on the confessional statement of Gulzar Ansari has also been granted regular bail by order dated 25.02.2022 in Cr. Misc. Case No. 5363 of 2022 and order dated 24.11.2022 in Cr. Misc. No. 33494 of 2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner has antecedent of 10 cases.

Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P. for the State, the court for the present is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, as such the bail application is dismissed.

However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of the charges. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Adnan/- U T