Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37160/2018rejected

Nandan Kumar Singh @ Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-02Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37160 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -499 Year- 2017 Thana -RUPASPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Nandan Kumar Singh @ Nitish Kumar, S/o Late Rajendra Singh, R/o Vill.- Dariyapur, P.S.- Dhobaha, O.P. (Ara Muffasil), District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranvijay Narain Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 02-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner, in the present case, is seeking regular bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No.499 of 2017, registered for offences alleged under Sections 399/402 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act. Petitioner has been apprehended at the spot with a 7.65 mm pistol and three live cartridges. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is in custody for last six months in connection with this case, but on going through the statements made in paragraph 3 of the application, this Court finds that this petitioner is involved in as many as 12 cases and all such cases are of serious nature, considering the criminal antecedent of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37160 of 2018 (2) dt.02-07-2018 the petitioner, this Court is not willing to enlarge the petitioner on bail by taking into consideration the period of custody. Let the trial of the present case be expedited. The Court has been informed that charge-sheet has already been submitted, if it is so, the trial court is expected to proceed further in the matter to conclude the trial as early as possible preferably within a period of nine months. The application stands dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U T