← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80580/2023allowed

Rajesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-14Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80580 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2023 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Rajesh Yadav Son Of Late Surat Lal Yadav Resident Of Village -BELGACHHI, Ps- Amour, Dist- Purnea 2.

Kamal Yadav @ Kamal Prasad Yadav Son Of Suryanand Yadav Resident Of Village -BELGACHHI, Ps- Amour, Dist- Purnea 3.

Rinkal Yadav @ Kanahaiya Yadav Son Of Rajesh Yadav Resident Of Village -BELGACHHI, Ps- Amour, Dist- Purnea 4.

Krishna Yadav @ Pawan Kr. Yadav @ Pawan Yadav Son Of Rajesh Yadav Resident Of Village -BELGACHHI, Ps- Amour, Dist- Purnea 5.

Shivanand Yadav Son Of Late Sampat Lal Yadav @ Sampat Yadav Resident Of Village -BELGACHHI, Ps- Amour, Dist- Purnea 6.

Ramanand Yadav Son Of Late Sampat Lal Yadav @ Sampat Yadav Resident Of Village -BELGACHHI, Ps- Amour, Dist- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 354(B), 385, 325 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant and his family members.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80580 of 2023(2) dt.14-12-2023 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that there is case and counter case between both the parties and both sides have sustained injuries and the injuries were found simple in nature. He further submits that there is admitted land dispute between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Amour P.S. Case No.74 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T