Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81527 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2024 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Roy Son of Bijendra Roy Village -Nirbullahchak, P.S.- Pachrukhiya,(Gaurichak) District -Patna 2.

Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Roy Son of Vijay Roy Village -Nirbullahchak, P.S.- Pachrukhiya, (Gaurichak) District -Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Patanjali Rishi, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners through virtual mode and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No.09 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3.

As per the FIR, the petitioners fired upon the informant and his nephew due to which the informant sustained injury on his left leg and his nephew sustained injury on his right leg. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81527 of 2024(2) dt.10-12-2024 2/2 occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. It is further submitted that the injuries of the injured persons are simple in nature. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on their behalf is hereby rejected. 7.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T