Sunny Kumar @ Baila @ Sunny v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77087 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-343 Year-2025 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada ====================================================== Sunny Kumar @ Baila @ Sunny Son Of Naresh Chorasiya Resident Of Village- Kasar, P.S. -Kasar, District -Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate Mr. Rajnish Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 343 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 111(2), 111(3) & 114(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that during patrolling, police intercepted two motorcycles and Rohit Kumar @ Ishu, was apprehended while three others fled away. On interrogation, the seized bikes were found to be stolen.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77087 of 2025(2) dt.18-11-2025 2/3 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 31.08.2025. Petitioner bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Referring to the FIR, it is pertinently submitted that petitioner was not apprehended on the spot, rather he was implicated in this case on the disclosure made by the apprehended co-accused. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023. Learned counsel submits that even if the allegation is taken on its face value, petitioner was acting as liner.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and manner of petitioner's implication, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77087 of 2025(2) dt.18-11-2025 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 343 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T