Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71127/2019bail granted

Rambabu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-18Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71127 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-587 Year-2019 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAMBABU MAHTO Son of Shankar Mahto Resident of VillageDumarvana, P.S-Pakaridayal, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Radha Mohan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 23.08.2019 in connection with Motihari Town P.S.Case No. 587 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Sections 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with the recovery of stolen motorcycle. No incriminating articles has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Co-accused Ravi Kumar, from whose possession motor-cycle was recovered, has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 72358 of 2019. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Motihari Town P.S.Case No. 587

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71127 of 2019(2) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 of 2019, on the following conditions-- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T