← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3516/2023allowed

Rinku Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-06Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3516 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2022 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Rinku Ansari Son Of Nasiruddin Ansari R/O Vill.- Gausnagar Wards No. 23, P.S.- Gopalganj Town, Distt.- Gopalganj 2.

Pintu Ansari Son Of Nasiruddin Ansari R/O Vill.- Gausnagar Wards No. 23, P.S.- Gopalganj Town, Distt.- Gopalganj 3.

Kashira Ansari @ Kashira Khatoon Wife Of Rinku Ansari R/O Vill.- Gausnagar Wards No. 23, P.S.- Gopalganj Town, Distt.- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that they have killed the daughter of the informant over demand of dowry of Rs. 2,00,000/-.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3516 of 2023(2) dt.06-04-2023 2/2 in nature. He submits that petitioner no. 1 is the Baisur, petitioner no. 2 is Devar and petitioner no. 3 is Gotni of the deceased. The husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody as mentioned in para-14 of this bail application. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 379 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T