← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3822/2024consigned

Mani Lal v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Mr Chitanya Prasad The Additional Chiefsecretary

2025-04-18Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3822 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10651 of 2024 ====================================================== Mani Lal son of Late Ramjee Laheri, Resident of Village-Kazi Fatuchak, P.S.- Barbigha, District-Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Mr Chitanya Prasad the Additional ChiefSecretary Water Resource Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Mr. Chitanya Prasad, the Additional Chief Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Officer, Mr. Abhilasha Sharma, Jamui. 4.

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Singh, the Chief Engienner, Water Resources Department, Bhagalpur.

5.

Mr. Dipak Pradhan, the Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Sinchai Anchal 2 Jamui, District-Jamui.

6.

Mr. Bihari Sinha, the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department, Irrigation Division No. 1, Laxmipur, Jamui.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akash Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Additional Advocate General 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-04-2025 Heard the parties.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party/s informs that the order dated 18.07.2024 passed in CWJC No. 10651 of 2024 has been complied with.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs that only part compliance has been made.

4. I have perused the show-caused filed on behalf of the opposite parties no. 2 to 6 and I find that the order dated

Patna High Court MJC No.3822 of 2024(3) dt.18-04-2025 2/2 18.07.2024 passed in CWJC No. 10651 of 2024 has been complied with, however, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he may avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

5. The present contempt petition, accordingly, stands consigned.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U