Meena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18529 of 2023 ====================================================== Meena Devi W/o Sri Santosh Chaudhari, R/o -At and P.O. - Chauri, P.S.- Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Jan Shiksha Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Assistant Director Jan Shiksha, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

5.

The District Education Officer, District - Aurangabad. 6.

The District Programme Officer, (Estt.), District - Aurangabad. 7.

The District Education Officer, Shaksharta, Aurangabad. 8.

The Block Education Officer, Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad. 9.

The Headmaster, upgraded Middle School, Bhawanipur, Block - Daud Nagar, District - Aurangabad.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha, AAG7 Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sinha, AC to AAG7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's case is squarely covered by the order dated 15.02.2023 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 17667 of 2021 (Abhishek Kumar Aman and Ors. vs. State of Bihar).

3. The petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation before the respondent no. 6 (The District

Patna High Court CWJC No.18529 of 2023(3) dt.15-04-2024 2/2 Programme Officer (Estt.)) along with all supporting documents and a copy of order dated 01.05.2023 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 481 of 2019 and L.P.A. No. 2185 of 2015 within a period of two weeks and the respondent no. 6 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter.

4. It is made clear that the respondent no. 6 shall be liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U