Sanjeet Paswan @ Nanhki Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78236 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-689 Year-2023 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sanjeet Paswan @ Nanhki Paswan S/O Ram Chandra Paswan VillageThathan Buzurge, Ps. Kajipur Sadar, Dist. Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ranjit Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-01-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
3. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hajipur Sadar (Kajipur) P.S. Case No. 689 of 2023 dated 05.09.2023 for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
4. As per the prosecution case, total 120 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from the back side of the shop of the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78236 of 2023(2) dt.02-01-2024 2/3 that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is accused in three other criminal cases and he is on bail in all the aforesaid cases as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. The recoverey is made from an open place which is accessible to anyone. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, hence no case is made out. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78236 of 2023(2) dt.02-01-2024 3/3 arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar (Kajipur) P.S. Case No. 689 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T