Chandra Shekhar Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43851 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -957 Year- 2015 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Chandra Shekhar Rai son of Nandu Rai

2. Nazir Rai son of Late Ram Dayal Rai Both residents of village - Amnabad, P.S. - Bihta, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 957 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners and other is of assault to the informant and others.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that no specific allegation has been attributed to the petitioners rather only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled and there is cae and counter case between the parties and further they have no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43851 of 2018 (2) dt.20-07-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate - I, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 957 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T