Patna High CourtCR. MISC./87128/2024dismissed

Arjun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-08Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87128 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2022 Thana- DERNI BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Arjun Kumar S/O Subhash kumar @ Subhash Singh R/o- Thika Kakarahat, P.S - Derni, District- Saran, Bihar- 841222.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suresh Pd Singh No. 1, Advocate Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Advocate Mr. Arbind Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-01-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 17.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5947 of 2024.

3. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The following order was passed on 17.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 5947 of 2024:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Derni P.S. Case No. 244 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are said to have committed a loot.

4. The name of the petitioner has come

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87128 of 2024(3) dt.08-01-2025 2/2 during investigation. He has similar antecedent also. The petitioner is in jail since 17.05.2023.

5. Considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

7. If the trial is delayed due to the prosecution, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

5. Despite serious arguments made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, no ground for review is made out.

6. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is again rejected. The court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner.

7. If the trial is delayed, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T