Nirmal Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18583 of 2024 ====================================================== Nirmal Kumar Singh s/O-Late Kapil Deo Rai Resident of VillageDhanchhuhan, P.S. Chouri, Circle Sahar, District-Bhojpur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary. Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, Bhojpur, Bihar.
4.
The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Bhojpur, Bihar. 5.
The Circle Officer, Sahar Bhojpur, Bihar.
6.
The Block Developemnt Officer, Sahar Bhojpur, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ranjeet Tiwary, Advocate Mr. Chandra Bhushan Upadhyay, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. P.K.Shahi, A.G.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 06-12-2024 The writ petition is filed to quash the recommendation made by the Circle Officer, Sahar, Bhojur, who has made a recommendation to the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Bhojpur for construction of a Gram Panchayat Raj Bhawan on a land situated at Mauza-Kanpahari Gram Panchayat- Dhanchhuhan, Circle-Sahar, District- Bhojur. The petitioner's contention seems to be that Gram Panchayat Bhawan should come up at MauzaDhanchhuhan, Gram Panchayat Dhanchhuhan, Circle-Sahar,
Patna High Court CWJC No.18583 of 2024 dt.06-12-2024 2/2 District- Bhojpur.
2. Admittedly, there is only a recommendation made and there are objections filed before the District Panchayat Raj Officer. Definitely, before the recommendation is accepted, the District Panchayat Raj Officer will consider the objections. We find absolutely no reason to initiate a public interest litigation on the feeble averments made in the writ petition.
3. We reject the writ petition, but, however, make it clear that the Panchayati Raj Officer will consider the objections, and a decision taken in accordance with law and as far as possible, following the guidelines issued; exception being made on valid reasoning.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Sujit/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 09.12.2024 Transmission Date