Ranjan Mistry @ Niranjan Mistri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4926 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-232 Year-2019 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== RANJAN MISTRY @ NIRANJAN MISTRI Son of Late Krishna Mistri Resident of Village- Gobardhan Bigha, P.S.- Makhdumpur, DistrictJehanabad. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sadanand Paswan, Spl. PP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 17.09.2019 passed by the learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Jehanabad in Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 232 of 2019 registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 325, 307, 337, 338/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(i)(r)(s)(w)/3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

There is case and counter case. There is general and omnibus allegation of commission of assault. Appellant is in custody since 28.07.2019. Investigation of the case is already

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4926 of 2019(4) dt.03-02-2020 2/2 complete.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. (c) The appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) mantreshwar/- U T