Sadanand Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.36728 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -175 Year- 2017 Thana -JADIA District- - ======================================================
1. Sadanand Yadav, S/o Late Sukdev Yadav,
2. Sanjiv Kumar @ Sanjiv Yadav,
3. Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Yadav Both Sons of Sadanand Yadav,
4. Sanichari Devi W/o Sadanand Yadav,
5. Ruvi Devi W/o Sanjiv Kumar @ Sanjiv Yadav, Are R/o Vill.- Datua Ward no. 7, P.S.- Jadia, District- Supaul.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jadia P.S.Case no.175 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 36634 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is of kidnapping the married daughter of the informant, who is aged about 20 years. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is no specific allegation attributed against them and they are 'Gotia'. The whole family members have been made accused in this case.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36728 of 2018 (3) dt.23-07-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM Vth, Supaul in connection with Jadia P.S.Case no.175 of 2017 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T