← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1824/2023rejected

Md. Khurshid Ansari @ Khurshid Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-05Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1824 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2022 Thana- BARARI District- Katihar ====================================================== MD. KHURSHID ANSARI @ KHURSHID ANSARI SON OF MD. SAJJAD ANSARI @ SAJJAD ANSARI R/O VILLAGE- SEMAPUR BANKA, P.S.- BARARI, DISTRICT- KATIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 05-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 363 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of kidnapping of the informant's nephew by some unknown miscreants for demand of ransom. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. He has got no criminal antecedent and languishing in judicial custody since 23.09.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that in para 19 of the case diary,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1824 of 2023(4) dt.05-07-2023 2/2 statement of the victim boy was recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C. wherein he has stated that anyhow, he managed to escape from the custody of the petitioner and he has made specific allegation of kidnapping for demand of ransom by the petitioner. During investigation, several witnesses have supported the prosecution story.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

The trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U