Babudan Rai @ Babudhan Rai @ Babughan Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42739 of 2018 ======================================================
1. BABUDAN RAI @ BABUDHAN RAI @ BABUGHAN RAI Son of Dharmnath Ray, Resident of Village- Manpur, P.S.- Jalalpur, DistrictSaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Pronati Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jalalpur P.S.Case no.210 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of snatching of Rs.25,000/- and also firing.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from his possession as well as he has no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42739 of 2018 (2) dt.24-07-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-IX, Saran, Chapra in connection with Jalalpur P.S.Case no.210 of 2017 dated 29.12.2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T