Prabhoo Yadav @ Prabhu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76351 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2025 Thana- KIUL District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Prabhoo Yadav @ Prabhu Yadav S/O Tiloki Yadav R/O Village- Banshipur, P.S.- Kiul, Distt.- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Moni Devi W/O Manish Pandey R/O Village- Banshipur, P.S.- Kiul, Distt.- Lakhisarai (Fictious Name) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Lalan Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Kiul P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025, dated 27.04.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 75, 352 and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per allegation, modesty of a 10 year old daughter of the informant was outraged by the petitioner while she had gone to a shop and when the father of the victim went to the house of accused-petitioner to complaint against his conduct, he was assaulted and threatened.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76351 of 2025(3) dt.23-02-2026 2/3 Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as per the allegation, at most it is a case of outraging the modesty. He also submits that no specific allegation or overt act has been made in regard to any other things.
5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.
6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection with Kiul P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, and on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76351 of 2025(3) dt.23-02-2026 3/3 the following conditions:
(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) shoaib/- U T