← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81209/2024bail granted

Mahesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2024-11-27Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81209 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2024 Thana- LAKHNAUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Mahesh Mahto S/o- Late Nathuni Mahto Village- Bela, Ward No.-5, P.S. Lakhnaur, District-Madhubani 2.

Durganand Kumar S/o- Nagendra Yadav Village- Sarauti W.No-11, PsGoghardihya Dist-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 27-11-2024 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioners are in judicial custody in connection with Lakhnaur P.S. Case No. 116 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, lodged on 13.09.2024 by the informant, Ravi Kumar Yaduvendra.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that during night patrolling, upon information, intercepted a motorcycle and there is recovery of 120 liters of country made liquor, which led to the F.I.R./arrest.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81209 of 2024(2) dt.27-11-2024 2/3 only because of criminal antecedent they have been implicated and have no concern with the motorcycle not being the owner, a passer-by who have been implicated, they have already remained in custody since 13.09.2024 (paragraph no.20 of the petition).

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Taking into account the aforesaid facts as also the fact that they do not own the motorcycle and are in custody since 13.09.2024, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of bail.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Lakhnaur P.S. Case No. 116 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioners who shall provide official document to show his bona fide;

(ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court failure to do so for two consecutive

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81209 of 2024(2) dt.27-11-2024 3/3 dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his their bond by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) the petitioners shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next one year to mark their attendance;

(iv) the petitioners shall in now way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

(v) the petitioners shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T