Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50645 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -219 Year- 2018 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================
1. Pintu Kumar Son of Naresh Sah @ Ram Naresh Sah Resident of Village - Lagauli Tilrath, P.S. - Barauni, District - Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Barauni P.S.Case No. 219 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is of assault by lathi, causing injury on the head of the informant. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the injuries are simple in nature. It is also submitted that the informant and petitioner are co-villagers and there is land dispute between the parties. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50645 of 2018 (2) dt.31-08-2018 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Barauni P.S.Case No. 219 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T