← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1485/2023bail granted

Bhogendra Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2023-01-30Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1485 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-762 Year-2021 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

BHOGENDRA SHARMA SON OF BAUE LAL SHARMA R/O WARD NO.- 03, VILL.- SALEMOUR, POST- BHOJ PARAUL, P.S.- BISFI, DISST.- MADHUBANI 2.

SUNITA DEVI WIFE OF BHOGENDRA SHARMA R/O WARD NO.- 03, VILL.- SALEMOUR, POST- BHOJ PARAUL, P.S.- BISFI, DISST.- MADHUBANI 3.

RAKESH SHARMA @ RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA SON OF BHOGENDRA SHARMA R/O WARD NO.- 03, VILL.- SALEMOUR, POST- BHOJ PARAUL, P.S.- BISFI, DISST.- MADHUBANI 4.

LALITA DEVI WIFE OF RAKESH SHARMA R/O WARD NO.- 03, VILL.- SALEMOUR, POST.- BHOJ PARAUL, P.S.- BISFI, DISTT.- MADHUBANI 5.

RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA SON OF BHOGENDRA SHARMA R/O WARD NO.- 03, VILL.- SALEMOUR, POST- BHOJ PARAUL, P.S.- BISFI, DISST.- MADHUBANI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikas Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-01-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 762 of 2021.

The Complainant, Vijaylaxmi Klumari, who is the wife of co-accused, Mukesh Kumar Sharma, has made allegation hat she was tortured for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1485 of 2023(2) dt.30-01-2023 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that they are in-laws having no relation with day-to-day affairs of the couple. As a matter of fact, it was a love marriage and the family members of the husband were not happy with that and they were residing separately with the husband of the complainant. They have been made accused merely because they are close relatives of the husband of the complainant. Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Strunjay Kshwaha, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Complaint Case No. 762 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T