Jitendra Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.869 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-592 Year-2022 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

JITENDRA SAHNI Son of Late Ramchandra Sahni R/o Ward 07, VillageBagdov, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Khagaria 2.

RAJESH SAHNI Son of Late Ramchandra Sahni R/o Ward 07, VillageBagdov, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Khagaria 3.

RAVI SAHNI Son of Late Ramchandra Sahni R/o Ward 07, VillageBagdov, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Om Prakash Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP Mr. Rajnish Kumar Singh, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-06-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354B, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused persons entered the house of the informant and assaulted the informant's side by means of several weapons due to which they sustained injuries.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.869 of 2023(3) dt.20-06-2023 2/2 against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is a case and counter-case between the parties. He further submits that he has enclosed the injury report in the supplementary affidavit and it is evident that the injury report of the injured persons have not supported the prosecution case. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as argument advanced on behalf of the parties, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.592 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T