← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68997/2019bail granted

Chandramani Singh @ Abhinay Patel @ Kamala v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-27Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68997 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-387 Year-2016 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE District- Nalanda ====================================================== CHANDRAMANI SINGH @ ABHINAY PATEL @ KAMALA Son of Vidya Bhushan Singh Resident of Village- Sarthua Milki, Post- Tope, P.S.- Shahjahapur, District- Patna, at present Muhalla- Patel Nagar, Fatuha, Near in West of Nagar Panchait Road, West Side Bye Pass, Fatuha, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Neelam Kumari W/O Chandra Mani Singh @ Abhinay Patel @ Kamla D/O Arvind Prasad Resident of Village- Pakhanpur, P.S.- Hilsa, DistrictNalanda. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Krishna Prasad Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. The same be kept on record.

In the light of statement made in the supplementary affidavit, counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph-3 of the main application in course of the day.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, O.P. No. 2 and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68997 of 2019(3) dt.27-11-2019 2/3 Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 17-09-2019. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner undertakes that he will cooperate during trial. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and O.P. No. 2 , it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Complaint Case No. 387© of 2016.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68997 of 2019(3) dt.27-11-2019 3/3 matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T