← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77410/2023bail granted

Vinay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-18Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77410 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-603 Year-2023 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== VINAY YADAV SON OF SHYAMDEV YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - BT BIGHA, P.S. - SHERGHATI, DISTRICT - GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashikant For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 18-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 603 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 379, 354 (B) and 511 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, some unknown persons entered into the house of the informant from roof and tried to commit rape with his wife who had tried to call the informant on his mobile phone but he was taking deep sleep at that time. It is further submitted that the accused persons were also strangulated his wife during the course of committing said crime and further took away her gold and necklace.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77410 of 2023(4) dt.18-04-2024 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of mere suspicion. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name surfaced in this case during the course of investigation only on mere suspicion. It is submitted that there is no any eye witness of the occurrence. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession or from his house and there is no any specific allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the petition and is in custody since 22.06.2023. Similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 5771 of 2024 vide order dated 15.04.2024.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

6. From perusal of the FIR, case diary, postmortem report and the impugned order dated 13.09.2023, it appears that petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name transpired in this case during the course of investigation on mere suspicion, accordingly the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77410 of 2023(4) dt.18-04-2024 3/3 1st, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Sherghati Gaya P.S. Case No. 603 of 2023.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) saurabhkr/- U T