Prince Masala Company v. The Regional Manager, Regional Office, (Sarb), State Bank Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22406 of 2019 ====================================================== Prince Masala Company through its Proprietor, Triveni Prasad (male), aged about - 47 years, son of late Harmoon Prasad Chaudhary, resident C/8, Bela Industrial Estate, MIC Bela, Muzaffarpur, P.s.- Bela, Muzaffarpur-842005, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Regional Manager, Regional Office, (SARB), State Bank of India West Gandhi Maidan, P.s.- Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna 2.

The Zonal Manager Zonal Office, State Bank of India, Building Poddar Complex, Mithanpura, P.o.- Ramna, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur 3.

The Branch Manager Sate Bank of India, Bela Branch, Muzaffarpur, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 02-01-2023 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "(i) For issuance of a direction to the respondent authority to dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner on 25.05.2019 under section 13(3-A) of the SARFAESI Act which is pending before them for a period of five months.

(ii) For issuance of a direction to the respondent authority not to take possession of factory premises of the petitioner under Section 13(4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (for short "SARFAESI Act") without disposal of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.22406 of 2019(2) dt.02-01-2023 2/2 representation filed by the petitioner dated 25.05.2019 under section 13(3-A) of the SARFAESI Act.

(iii) For restraining the respondent authorities from taking possession of the petitioner factory premises during the pendency of this writ application or status quo should be maintained.

(iv) For any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner may be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of this case."

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.

Permission granted.

Present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/K.C.Jha U